FourFeetz Studios

Public Framework

Character Consistency Planning Framework

A public planning outline for reviewing identity, wardrobe, proportions, and visual continuity across generated scenes.

Character Consistency Planning Framework preview

Overview

Built for Repeatable Work

This web guide separates stable visual traits from scene-specific direction so creators can review continuity without copying FourFeetz character prompts or internal bibles.

Public Reference

What This Web Guide Covers

This page is the resource itself. It provides a public planning outline rather than a downloadable FourFeetz production package, character master prompt, internal bible, or current core settings.

01

Observable identity fields

02

Reference-view planning

03

Expression and wardrobe checks

04

Common identity-drift review points

How to Use

A Practical Process

  1. Step 1

    Define only the visible traits needed for your own original character.

  2. Step 2

    Build one approved reference image for the intended shot scale.

  3. Step 3

    Keep stable visual traits separate from scene action and camera direction.

  4. Step 4

    Change one scene variable at a time while testing.

  5. Step 5

    Review face, proportions, colors, and accessories before approving a frame.

Worked example from published work

Separate HARU and PORI before describing motion

A Golden Evening Together is an 18-second vertical short. Its published production record identifies HARU by upright ears and a brown scarf, and the smaller PORI by curls and a green neckerchief. Use those observable differences to build a continuity sheet.

This teaching example applies the linked public record to this resource. It is not the original private prompt or production log.

Identity
HARU: cream-white Jindo puppy, upright ears, brown scarf. PORI: smaller apricot poodle, curls, green neckerchief.
Relationship
Keep the relative body scale and a readable gap between the silhouettes.
Motion review
Check that the active character does not cover the other character's face or accessory.
Review points
Compare both characters at the opening, during movement and in the resting finish.

The decision this example supports

If a scarf changes character or the silhouettes merge, revise the reference or simplify the action before adjusting the color grade. Identity errors change who the viewer thinks is on screen; finishing cannot resolve that ambiguity.

Best Practices

Use It Well

Use observable visual language instead of personality adjectives.
Keep accessory names and colors identical.
Reuse approved references when the tool supports them.
Archive approved frames as future review evidence.

FAQ

Questions, Answered

Does this work across different models?

The review structure is model-neutral, although reference-image controls vary by platform.

Does this include FourFeetz character prompts?

No. FourFeetz master prompts, internal character bibles, weighting logic, and current core settings remain private.

FourFeetz Toolkit

Turn the guide into a finished story.

See the workflow in action

Continue Exploring